Angular has been a popular choice for companies looking to create web applications, but it has also been the cause of billions of dollars in losses. This has been largely due to the complexity of the framework and its lack of scalability. Over the years, companies have invested heavily in developing large-scale applications with the framework, only to find out that when the application needs to be scaled up, it is unable to do so. The issue lies in the fact that Angular is built on a monolithic architecture, which makes it difficult to scale up and maintain. This means that companies have to invest additional resources in order to keep the application running smoothly. This significant overhead cost has caused companies to lose out on potential profits.
In addition to these issues, Angular also lacks flexibility when it comes to making changes and adapting to new technologies. As a result, companies have had to invest in additional resources in order to make sure their applications can remain up-to-date. Overall, Angular has proven to be a costly framework for companies. It is not a scalable solution and has caused companies to incur significant losses. This is why many companies are now looking at other frameworks that are better suited for large-scale applications. If companies want to remain competitive and maximize their potential profits, it is time to look beyond Angular.
Outright reject UI compilers
Sass and Less is another "fad-tech" that has been around for a long and needs to disappear. The way these CSS frameworks organize their code is noteworthy.
The truth about these CSS pseudo-languages is that, in the end, all they truly do is create neat, well-targeted CSS code, which is what we should all be creating natively anyhow. They are also not easier to use or understand. There are no issues in using Sass or Less and pre-compile them in your own development environment. These files should never, however, enter the CICD pipeline to be compiled during deployments. The same holds true for every other JavaScript framework or library that finally compiles to standard ECMA.
What ought to be a fairly straightforward deployment procedure becomes clogged and bloated with each step that is added to the CICD pipeline. Instead of adding extra stages merely because "Jenkins" permits it, we should be looking for methods to streamline the process.
Also Read: What Is Ruling 2023: Product Analytics VS Marketing Analytics
The UI is getting too cluttered because of the Angular
The condition of UI nowadays is not "art"; rather, it is a cluster- (expletive omitted). The simplicity of the user interface is being destroyed rather than made easier by frameworks like Angular and others.
The argument is that you don't need a bulky framework to create a functional UX or write a clean, attractive UI. Without overburdening the frontend with illegible and impossible-to-debug compiled JS, you may utilize whatever native templating engine your backend offers.
Companies are spending billions on Angular
A framework should, in the end, make coding simpler rather than more difficult. That simplicity of use is meant to save businesses money, not increase their expenses.
But Angular's high operating costs are exactly what is taking place.
Unfortunately, businesses must spend a lot of money on staff training and retraining because Angular (and other UI frameworks as well) constantly changes its versions. Yes, Angular has now said that all future versions will be backward compatible, but it will just serve to increase complexity when the next "really great" component is introduced and requires a complete overhaul.
What Should Take Angular's Place?
Simply replacing it with nothing is the solution. Remove it completely. Eliminate everything and replace it with simple, user-friendly JavaScript enclosures.
We have nothing against using other UI elements, CSS frameworks like Bootstrap, or open-source utilities like jQuery. These are quite simple to "include" with only one or two lines of code, and they really do simplify our jobs as developers.
But if the framework, like Tailwind, requires Node.js to function or if you have to continually retrain users to use it because its maintainers constantly making updates, all of that merely ends up costing you money.
JavaScript encloses, which were created with a single goal in mind, offer the ideal fit and balance between utilizing the complexity of the current UI while keeping the DOM's aesthetic simplicity.
Also Read: 2023 Best Custom Software For Businesses Growth
Conclusion
The ease of writing code, any code, is the Holy Grail. But as contemporary engineers, we've all but forgotten that simplicity. We've fallen victim to the trend of whatever brand-new, shiny technology our favorite tech company or university has pushed in our faces as "state-of-the-art."
The university or Google, whatever, isn't covering your employment costs. It's time CTOs reclaimed control of the technological stack, abandoned fad tech, and brought us all back to logically sound, elegantly simple user interfaces.
If you are looking for ways to skyrocket your business, Weblozy is the key to go! Weblozy is a web and software development company dedicated to creating solutions that are tailored to your specific business needs. With a team of highly skilled and experienced developers, Weblozy can help you get the most out of your web and software investments.